a lot to catch up here 
1 Like
Thanks i know there was new machine but missed euclidean .
1 Like
What about the delay? A finer and not timed option would be great, no?
2 Likes
How many requests can we send to elektron before we’re sent to spam folder?
I imagine CTL-AL has been requested a thousand times,
but if we cant’ have it, can we request it just CTL-AL for track volume level?
Seriously, how do you mix 12 tracks with only one volume control?
So often I just want to “lower all other tracks’ volume” since there’s no more headroom for the current track to go louder.
3 Likes
I’d love see an option to control the LEN parameter in the euclidean page with MIDI.
1 Like
Once again
. A second filter like the digitakt
. A mixer view
3 Likes
I have some ideas for a future update:
Page Init Revert
Redacted - this is already available with the CLEAR command (PAGE+PLAY).
CONTROL-ALL
Says it all really - FUNC+Knob to affect every track relative parameter in the same way, like on the Digis. FUNC+NO to reload the Kit, similar to how the Machinedrum’s Control-All works.
Snap LFO > Tune values to Pad Scale
For generation of controlled melodic content, it would be awesome if it were possible for the LFO > Tune parameter to only hit notes according to the Pad Scale chosen, ie C Minor Pentatonic. I expect this isn’t possible, but one can dream.
Setting to choose default starting LFO Settings
Would love to be able to choose the default starting state of a track’s LFO. I’d like for example to have the Exponential Wave and One-Shot Mod as the defaults, as well as the default mod destination as Pitch, as I would find these more conducive to sound sound design rather than starting from a blank slate.
More Clap Machines
One clap machine across the board? Come on guys, give us more crispy claps! 
Base Width Filter
Because many machines generate a huge amount of low-end which can only be cleaned up by using either using the filter or resampling… Which isn’t the end of the world, but who wouldn’t want a second filter? Even just on the samples, prior to hitting the VCA.
1 Like
Page init revert is very very interesting! To load only one page from the last saved. Cool cool
Control all can be kinda done, if very limited, on the perf page. So that i dont really mind. But many people would be all about it. Still function button is taken by snap, and if you got shit encoders u ouldnt be able to snap anotherway.
Snap lfo to tune would create many interference with other functions i imagine.
Lfo settings can be done with a template kit. No?
But for the last 2 i m all in.
A digital base width filter is a big must! (maybe some people would get offended if rytm is not all analog path).
Also a digital hpfilter on the sample would be incredible. Like really steep. Mmmm…
New clap machines is also a must. An anlog one and a digital one, maybe? would be cool to have bit reduction/ sample rate reduction on the waveform.
Something like the SY Chip, but tuned for clappy perc sounds would be tight.
Chip already makes some nice bitty splats.
isn’t it the same as Page+Clear?
1 Like
It may well be, must have missed that if so. Will check in a bit, thank you!
Edit: you are 100% right, that is the answer. Will update my post. Very happy.
2 Likes
I have an Analog Rytm MKII for over a year now and there are not much things I desire to add especially after 1.7 update. But I’m still missing those features (most of them are pretty common request as I know):
- Mixer page the same as in Analog Four.
- Second LFO. If it’s hardware lock maybe there are other ways to implement this because usually I don’t use LFO on every track so maybe it can be done by unassigned LFO (maybe also an option to stack them / LFO machine, although I’m not much into sacrificing whole track for it)
- Some visualization of compressor work
Other things which I desire less important but it would be cool to have Sample Rate Reduction, exponentional EG, bandpass filter (at least for samples), one more clap machine. I think that’s all.
4 Likes
Elektron have officially stated that a second lfo isn’t possible as the processor is already maxxed out.
4 Likes
when they released 1.70 they said they couldn’t find a way to implement it in 1.70 because of hardware limitations but they will keep looking for a solution.
personally i’d rather like them to find a way to add the repitch and slice machines from the digitakt instead of a 2nd lfo if only either of these is possible.
9 Likes
Maybe they can focus on using the existing lfos on other tracks when not in use…
1 Like
I wonder how that would work on rytm, you have 13 tracks but only 8 param encoders, so if you split the mixer into two pages it would be very uncomfortable… just wondering what’s the implementation would look like…
EDIT: I’ve checked the Syntakt manual and that’s pretty much how it works, split into two pages, does anyone here has Syntakt and can comment if that’s useful?
I know on DN I hate paging through the mixer, I’ve mapped every track and input levels to EC4 instead of going through the pages…
that would be amazing
2 Likes
I’d like to see a mixer which mirror back panel of RYTM (BD, SD, RS/CP, BT, LT, MT/HT, CH/OH, CY/CB) so 8 levels in total. With 8 encoders it’s a perfect combination on my opinion. Combined tracks can share the same level and maybe it’s not so flexible but it’s still better than nothing and a good compromise.
I’ve seen a lot of suggestions about re-assignable LFOs, like on the Machinedrum.
I really liked that idea also (as with a lot of other MD specialties), but then when digging further into the MD, I got the impression that it does not have Sounds, in the way the newer machines have.
How would you be able to load a sound from the Sound Pool, if it uses another track’s LFO? It might be in use already?
If I understand correctly, then in the MD you only have Kits, so you load all 16 “sounds” at the same time.
I find that when you dig into the features of the individual products, you will find that through out the chronology of their releases, there is a refinement of workflow concepts, and an introduction of specific terms for elements of the sequencer and sound architecture, most of which we now take for granted.
It’s like the general design philosophy is to be as consistent as absolutely possible across the product line, but with small changes introduced as the overall interaction concept undergoes evolution.
Some things are great ideas, but will be incongruent with other incoming features and will be cut and eventually forgotten.
Maybe assignable LFOs will come back one day in a new OctaMachineRytm chimera we all secretly hope is under wraps, but I deem it highly unlikely that any post-MD product would introduce it. It would mess too much with established workflow / architecture.
4 Likes
It would be useful if Elektron could provide a bit more assistance with info on using the Digi boxes’ Midi LFOs to control parameters on the Rytm. I know it’s fairly clear with most CCs but it gets a bit more confusing when you need to assign NRPNs, LSBs and MSBs etc.
I did manage to get the DT’s midi LFO to modulate the delay a while back but had to use Cubase’s midi monitor to reverse engineer what was going on and it didn’t seem to match what was in the literature afaicr.
playing with the Live 12 beta’s euclidean generator made me wish there was an option to set velocity per pulse, that way you could easily have 3 velocities by utilizing the ACCENT, would be really cool thing to have a velocity variation generator, especially when combined with the velocity macros… imo that’s even better then having LENGTH as with with velocity macros you can control the AMP HOLD in addition to volume or filter or lfo amount or send levels, etc…
4 Likes